Logo Background RSS

Square Enix to Crush Fanboyism

  • Written by DeanDean 50 Comments50 Comments Comments
    Last Updated: July 16, 2008

    With Square Enix recently abolishing Playstation 3’s Final Fantasy XIII exclusivity at E3 2008, they in turn declared war on Fanboyism.

    For those new to the gaming world, “fanboy” is a term used to describe an individual who is devoted to a single subject or point of view. The fanboy’s Square Enix were interested in crushing were those who had a loyality to the Sony Playstation 3. And they did just that, with perhaps the most highly anticipated game of the 21st century; Final Fantasy XIII.

    Square Enix at E3 2008 in Los Angeles

    Square Enix is hardly inexperienced with war. Back in the late 1900’s Square switched their iconic Final Fantasy titles to Sony’s first Playstation from Nintendo’s current systems. This was caused by a dispute with Nintendo over its use of faster and more expensive cartridges, as opposed to the slower, cheaper, and much higher capacity compact discs used on Sony’s Playstation.

    This left a few Nintendo fanboy’s in a very disappointed state in 1997 as all they could is watch in envy as Final Fantasy VII was released on the Sony Playstation with 3-dimensional graphics with fully pre-rendered backgrounds.

    It turned out Square made the right decision. Final Fantasy VII was a major critical and commercial success, the game even remains arguably the most popular title in the series. It is argued today that if Square, now Square Enix, didn’t move Final Fantasy to Sony’s Playstation then - Final Fantasy, as we know it, wouldnt exist today.


    The face of 21st Century Square Enix

    With Square Enix’s decision to move their main Final Fantasy title multi-platform last Monday, it is understood that they hope to widen their audience and income, not forgetting to crush fanboyism. Already boasting Final Fantasy titles on Nintendo’s DS and Wii, Sony’s Playstation 3 and PSP it was only a matter of time till one hits Xbox. The first was Final Fantasy XI, and now its Final Fantasy XIII.  Square Enix and fans now expect its highly likely that future Final Fantasy titles ie. XIV, XV will be multi-platform.

    But have they damaged their fanbase?

    Sony Playstation 3 fanboys, some with an breath of selfishness, are currently furious and disappointed that Square Enix has “betrayed” them in choosing to share Final Fantasy XIII. Some neutral gamers claim that many of these Playstation 3 fans are too passionate and delusional. With plenty of online petitons cropping up, the neutral gamers argee that those fans signing the petitons are under the misguided belief that their demands are more important than money, and the deluded view that the greater gaming public doesn’t deserve to experience the game as much as they do.

    Square Enix’s damage to move Final Fantasy XIII to the XBox 360 has only effected a minority of Playstation 3 owners. They would have expected this, however come when Final Fantasy XIII is eventually released Square Enix expects almost every Sony Playstation 3 fanboy that likes Final Fantasy will buy the game and enjoy.

    With the game multi-platformised the impact will be greater and create a far greater experience see-ing as everyone will be playing Final Fantasy XIII. Square Enix even believe a sense of unity between the rival consoles will form a dampening on fanboyism, perhaps even in the future crush it. But for that to happen the other blockbuster games will have to appear on all consoles and abolish their exclusivity.

    At the moment till Square Enix defeat fanboyism all a gamer can do is sit back and enjoy a few petitons saying “No! to Final Fantasy XIII on Xbox360″

    The worst/incorrect comments picked up from various “No! to Final Fantasy XIII on XBox360″ petitons include:
    - Im not buying Final Fantasy XIII anymore because Xbox 360 gamers don’t deserve it. (Should we discriminate people now?)

    - Final Fantasy is a Playstation game. (Was originally a Nintendo game)
    - I’m unwilling to buy the game if it’s not an exclusive PS3 version.
    - Square Enix has chosen money over its fanbase. There goes my loyalty. (Many Final Fantasy fans own an Xbox 360)

    However is Square Enix wrong to share Final Fantasy XIII?

    Legit comments picked up from various No! to Final Fantasy XIII on XBox360″ petitions include:
    - One of the reasons I bought a PS3 was because FFXIII was an exclusive game - now I’m wondering why I ever bought one considering I have a 360! (Understandable, but you should never take everything guaranteed)

    - Whats the big deal, its an everyone wins situation - stop being bitter!

    Without a doubt Square Enix did go back on their word, however till they speak out to Playstation 3 fans we will never truly know why…

Advertisement

50 Comments
  1. #1 Chiko_Tech
    July 16, 2008 pm31 5:43 pm

    So why they just don’t give ps3 owners Star Ocean 4 or Infinite Undiscovery or even give the same date of The last Remmant, plaesse they are not crushing fanboyism they are creating a masive war, and they letting the ps3 owners alone they just skipped the ps3, and passing to the 360, because Microsoft give him money for being exclusive, Square eniz is not saving nothing he is destroying the gamming industry by going just like other accpeting money from microsoft so microsoft can monopolize the gamming industry just like he is doing with the PC software. Your article is not well studied you need to study this things first is money in the table not more.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  2. #2 Lia
    July 16, 2008 pm31 6:45 pm

    Your article reeks of bull****ery.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  3. #3 asdf
    July 16, 2008 pm31 6:52 pm

    Square is where the money is. They have always been. I dont understand the uproar.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  4. #4 Howler3366
    July 16, 2008 pm31 6:57 pm

    Its really not that big of a deal to me if FF makes it to other platforms I will enjoy the game on my PS3.

    The only real exclusives left should be first party games. With that said, Square-Enix is in it for the money and should therefore release ALL of their games cross platform, day and date AND be of equal quality.

    This would give them a huge fanbase as well, as a really nice revenue stream.

    In my book there should not even be, third party “timed” exclusives for any platform.

    Again, true multiplatform, identical quality (no excuses for shoddy ports) and a day and date release for all platforms involved.

    Other than that, I hope that the 360 fans out there enjoy Final Fantasy on the 360. I will enjoy mine on the PS3.

    Good gaming to you all!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  5. #5 srammij
    July 16, 2008 pm31 6:59 pm

    I don’t really have a problem with this, as long as the PS3 version isn’t compromised in any way. They must be releasing the xb360 version on multi-discs to be able to hold as much as the blu-ray.

    The reason i bought my PS3 was because of the processing power for gaming and the ability to hold a lot more information. My only problem with multi-platform gaming is that the PS3 version usually suffers to compromise for the other versions which either can’t hold as much info, or aren’t powerful enough to create the same stunning imagery, as SOME ps3 titles are capable of doing.

    It makes sense that companies want to reach a larger market, and to do that they would have to design games multi-platform to achieve a higher amount of sales… which i think they’re entitled to. Sony and Microsoft should really just bury the hatchet and start designing systems that are a little bit more similar, so that developers don’t have to work twice as hard to bring all gamers all games to all systems. I leave Nintendo out, because they clearly refuse to make any technological leaps to keep up with advancing technology in the gaming world.

    Whatever happened to the concept of the one machine, or box you hook up to your tv and everything is downloaded off the internet? There are a few games i would like to play on the 360, but i consider myself a gamer, not a crazy hardcore gamer who has to have every system, and i certainly have more important things to spend my money on, then buying each system.

    If the big gaming companies want to move forward, they need to start working together a little more, and with developers and focus on bringing the gaming community a more unified global gaming world.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  6. #6 darkpower
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:06 pm

    You might be inclined also to think it would’ve happened anyway at some point, just not that soon (and the two versions may not come out at the same time here, anyway, and Versus 13 is still exclusive). Also for all we know, the 360 FF13 may turn out to be what The Orange Box was for the PS3 (looks and plays like crap without any hope for a fix). It’s looking like the PS3 might get their version first over here. And this article is somewhat misleading, anyway (it’s not like anyone’s wanting to start a riot about it….yet).

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  7. #7 911 Gaming
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:20 pm

    As I have said before, I have no problem with Square Enix’s decision to go Multi-Platform. I do, however, have a problem, with the fact that FFXIII may be shorter, or Xbox 360 may have to “switch discs,” or maybe the game may be less engaging with effects and such. I, in fact, bought a PS3 before my 360 because I wanted FFXIII, DMC4, MGS4, RE5 etc. However, 3 of those games have made the move to 360. I have no problem with that (except for $200 down the drain a year and a half ago). Lets keep in mind I have all 3 systems, so I don’t give a crap.
    But, Square Enix has said before that “, FFXIII is only possible on the PS3.” And, Katise, a leader in Square Enix, in a recent interview, stated “, blu-ray and … [pause] … the other format.”

    They have no idea what they’re doing for the Xbox 360. Its probably as much a suprise that Microsoft handed Square a check for [probably $50 mill] as it is to Sony. I’m not sure whats going on here, but the 360 owners are going to get the short end of the stick.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  8. #8 WWII
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:26 pm

    So why they just don’t give ps3 owners Star Ocean 4 or Infinite Undiscovery or even give the same date of The last Remmant???

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  9. #9 WWII
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:27 pm

    many FF fans owns an x360? if that were true then they weren’t real fans because FF games were PS exclusive since, 10 years ago?

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  10. #10 WWII
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:28 pm

    I bet you’re an X360 fanboy or at least just has an X360…

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  11. #11 John
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:32 pm

    The problem I have with your post is, you claim that this is better for gaming in general, and I’ll ask, how?

    What defines consoles in the game selection. That is what we purchase them for, that is what we use them for.

    However, the only way to effectively differentiate between consoles, is to have lineups that different consoles can not offer. This is where exclusives come in.

    Now, believe it or not, having BIG name exclusives is a big factor in the growth of the videogame market. It will constantly fuel competition between market competitors, and it will ensure that any console you purchase, will not be a mistake, as you will in fact have some form of justification for owning it.

    If every console were to do away with exclusives, there would be no difference, and it in the end, it would be better to go with a single hardware solution. However, this would lead to an overall decline in the quality in the market, as the lack of competition would not be fueling anyone to make changes, and revolutionary products.

    This isn’t going to be caused by the loss of FFXIII’s exclusivity, however, it is a telling sign of what could be, if this idea of “Multiplatform>Exclusive” comes to be common ideal.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  12. #12 Heavenly_King
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:53 pm

    Chiko is right. I also think that there are a lot of reasons to own a PS3 right now: MGS4, GOW3, R2, Uncharted, WNC, GT5P, R&C, among many others. So I don´t recommend to anyone to sell their PS3 because they will miss a lot of AAA titles.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  13. #13 gam
    July 16, 2008 pm31 7:58 pm

    And how do you know Microsoft gave Square enix (with a x) any money?

    How do you know Sony didn’t do that to get FF from Ninty.
    Microsoft are only following Sony’s lead if they did pay Square.

    Which I don’t think they did you’re just bitter and making things up

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  14. #14 Gumionday
    July 16, 2008 pm31 8:33 pm

    I totally agree with Chiko_Tech; all they have done is made the console war that much more heated. But my main thing is that the PS3 version will suffer because of the XBOX360, we all know that PS3 has in it more processing power and the ability to make a huge game with Blu-ray. But we will never know how good this game could have been if it was a PS3 exclusive and now we sony fans have to wait for the xbox version to catch up. I might be buying the Japanese PS3 only version even though I don’t speak Japanese.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  15. #15 josly
    July 16, 2008 pm31 8:35 pm

    You Sony fanboys all spout the money thing over and over again like it’s something Sony wouldn’t do. You are correct to a point when it comes to games, but wake up and smell the roses. Money was paid on BDs behalf to Warners, just as HD-DVD paid Paramount. It happens, but Sony invest 500 million to win a movie format war and once again showed the ignorance to the hardcore gamers that were early adopters on the new multimedia system. Before you start bashing me for being an Xbot, I have owned a PS3 since launch.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  16. #16 LordRaoh
    July 16, 2008 pm31 8:36 pm

    If square (or this article) wants to crush fanboyism then square should release last remnant at the same time for both console at the same time. star ocean for both consoles etc etc etc etc

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  17. #17 Tempist
    July 16, 2008 pm31 8:40 pm

    Well written, well explained. If more people took the time to read the facts and listen to what people have to say, then upsets like this wouldn’t come about. It’s not like they made FF13 exclusive to the 360, as well it’s more than likely that any additional content will be for the PS3 rather than the 360.

    Lets give it time and see where things go.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  18. #18 valkyre
    July 16, 2008 pm31 8:51 pm

    Yeah i would also wanna ask the same question with Chiko_Tech.

    I have no problem with FFXIII being multiplatform , my problem is:

    a: why do i have to wait for the 360 port version to be complete first before i am able to play FFXIII , while Last Remnant will be shipped when its ready for 360 and i will have to wait.

    b: why dont they crush fanboyism by announcing Star Ocean 4 for PS3 too?Doesnt that apply the same way?

    c: i already mentioned it , why Last Remnant gets timed exclusivity?Why not wait for PS3 version the same wan PS3 waits for 360’s FFXIII version to be complete?

    Sounds rather confusing and weird if you ask me…

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  19. #19 dionusos
    July 16, 2008 pm31 9:02 pm

    This is CLEARLY false. If Square Enix was trying to end fanboyism, then Star Ocean 4, Last Remnant, and Infinite Undiscovery would all be multiplat same-day releases. One is not same-day, and the other two are not slated for the PS3. How anyone can actually believe Square Enix is trying to end fanboyism by letting a PS3 exclusive go multiplat, but not letting the 360 exclusives go multiplat is beyond me.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  20. #20 Rad
    July 16, 2008 pm31 9:10 pm

    It’s never that for me. Point is, multiplatform games are rarely, if ever, as polished as exclusives. Exclusives on BOTH systems take full advantage of the specs of the hardware. Gears is fantastic because it takes advantage of the 360’s capabilities. As does Mario Galaxy on Wii and Uncharted on PS3. Once a game becomes a port, or development resources become divided, more becomes at stake.

    Are there great, polished, multiplats out there? Sure! COD4 is a great example as is Devil May Cry. But for the most part…ESPECIALLY like a game on the scale of FFXIII, quality gets lost in the translation. And thats all we care about as gamers…..as CONSUMERS……is quality.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  21. #21 TristanMike
    July 16, 2008 pm31 9:27 pm

    Though your article has some merit to it, the fact remains, as another poster pointed out, the “loss of exclusivity” is only working one way, the way to the 360. Sony is not getting the other games that SquareEnix is currently developing (or at least we don’t know of it now).

    Also, I’d buy the “multi-platform” argument a little more if both consoles offered the exact same thing, which we know, they don’t. The PS3 has a standard Hard Drive, it has massive storage on 50 GB Blu-Ray’s, it has an entirely different architecture than the 360, the 360 is better at anti-alising and has more overall usable video RAM for example.

    The point is that once you go multiplatform, then you remove the advantages that both systems have and get a bland, sub-par version of the original vision or you then end up with two different experiences. For better or for worse, you’re still segmenting the crowd, driving the “war” further.

    You could say the same thing about Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD, you could say that both were good… but the reality is that one HAD to die… there is too much confusion in the market as it is and confusion is never a good thing.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  22. #22 Max
    July 16, 2008 pm31 9:30 pm

    war on Fanboyism? they made me hate M$ more

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  23. #23 Cloud
    July 16, 2008 pm31 10:30 pm

    I really doubt you know what “Square-Enix” wants, feels, intends and plenty of other stuff you mention. The reason behind the decision is unknown, except to MS and Square-Enix themselves.

    I think Square-Enix demonstrated a lack of faith on their fanbase with the decision. Won’t FF fans buy a PS3 to get the game?…I think they would’ve. Now, however, they just might not do it, because if they own a 360 they can just play it there…with the only drawback being the probable constant disc-swapping, and port problems.

    What bothers me is that, even though S-E didn’t want to admit it, this will cause a DELAY ON THE RELEASE OF THE GAME for the PS3 is North America and Europe. It’s not true that you port a game just as fast as you localize it, it’s not easy to port a game, and it’s less easy for a company that is not much experienced with that console. The fair think would’ve been to say that the PS3 would release when it’s ready, and that the X360 version would come later on when it’s ready. The simultaneous release on both consoles is probably the work of money paid by MS, no other explanation.

    Oh well, the past stays in the past, and let’s just look forward for the future. Whether this will have an effect on the game, or anything else, just remains to be seen. I just think you don’t know S-E’s goal, and I HIGHLY DOUBT it’s to crush fanboyism and generate an union between gamers…please, get real. It’s just about the money, and it has always been. And that applies to Square Enix, Capcom, EA, BioWare, THQ, Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft and any other company you can think of.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  24. #24 Tony
    July 16, 2008 pm31 10:42 pm

    Are you serious? Square wants to destroy Fanboy-ism? so what you are trying to tell me is that Square has the power to change human nature? I think not, and I would sincerely doubt their decision was based on anything other than a firm belief that additional monies could be reaped from the 360. There have and there will always be fanboys. To ‘crush’ so called fanboy-ism would require the destruction of choice, free will and passion.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  25. #25 solsub
    July 16, 2008 pm31 11:08 pm

    @author

    Your heart’s in the right place but I think you have failed to see the bigger picture. Do you realize how many stupid “lol now teh pos3 is really useless!!1!” comments have littered the web over the past couple of days?

    Venting the flames is not an effective way of extinguishing them. Suddenly every 360 gamer has turned into a huge JRPG fan and has been taking a piss on everyone who claims to own a PS3. I can really see how Square is “Crushing fanboyism” at the moment, especially after seeing the 360 boys (or Xbots, whatever) out in full force.

    I guess it was convenient of you to forget about them while writing this, eh?

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  26. #26 RuddigerPez
    July 16, 2008 pm31 11:36 pm

    While I agree that its perfectly in SE’s rights to choose to release a game multi-platform, its quite a dick move to take forever in developing it, teasing for years and years that it will be PS3 only, and then suddenly announcing its multi-platform. So its perfectly within everyone’s right to be pissed about this, and if they are pissed enough, to choose not to purchase the game for this very reason.

    Do the people who write articles like this realize that they are no different than those they critique? The internet gives everyone a voice, why complain when people choose to use that voice for reasons you don’t agree with? Its the nature of the internet and people in general…live with it.

    Speaking of my voice…I’m of the opinion that SE is becoming a giant whore of a company, interested in quantity over quality. Every game the used to release was a grade A title, now they generate mostly average games, and this is mostly because they continue to diversify instead of focus (again, in the interest of money only). Soon we’ll have another EA on our hands. I won’t be buying FFXIII because of that reason and because I’m getting sick of JRPGs anyways.

    Fanboys live on…

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  27. #27 Bandit King
    July 17, 2008 pm31 12:48 am

    While I agree with this, if Square-Enix want’s to crush fanboyism them they should stop favoring the 360 and the MS money hat. This is not about Final Fantasy 13, for me as a PS3 owner I want all of 360’s exclusive Square-Enix RPG’s other wise your whole point is moot. Clearly MS paid for this and big time, Square-Enix can’t play the “Crush the fanboys” card nor the “For the better of the industry” because as long as they keep taking money from MS and gving them RPG’s that PS3 owners can’t have this article is baseless and misguided, as that type of behavior leads to more fanboyism.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  28. #28 Tom
    July 17, 2008 pm31 12:57 am

    Point is if Square-Enix want to unify console owners then they need to stop taking money from the MS money hat. Simple facts tell you that Square-Enix went multi plat because MS paid them to, not for any other reason. S-E is still giving 360 3 exclusive RPG’s that PS3 owners will not get (either on time or at all)and you expect me to buy the line your selling here? Perhaps if S-E said “FF 13 to 360 and Star Ocean, and Infinite Undiscovery to PS3″ then there would be some basis to your article, as it stands now Square-Enix took the bribe, drank the Kool-aid, bit the bait whatever you call it they made this decision because of a bribe, and with out the other exclusives coming to PS3 this article is completely worthless. Good job you failed!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  29. #29 Plissken
    July 17, 2008 pm31 2:06 am

    You ps3 boys crack me the hell up. Go ahead and skip buying FF13 for the ps3 since its coming out on 360. When Square sees that no one is buying FF13 on ps3, when they make FF14 it might as well be 360 exclusive. Why go to the trouble and spend all the money to make all those ps3 disks if no one is gonna buy them. I’ll be sitting in front of my HDTV playing FF13 on my XBOX the day that bad boy come out.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  30. #30 SilexAstrum
    July 17, 2008 pm31 3:51 am

    Lets get a few things straight. 360 can do visuals just as well as ps3 so stop already with bullshit hardware superiority complex. 2nd, what’s so different about swapping a disk or waiting 3 minutes for a section of the game to install to the harddisk? Its a draw. You ps3 users wont get a dumbed down game and 360 version will be just as great. Stop all the boohooing you sissies. Its just a game.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  31. #31 Chris
    July 17, 2008 pm31 5:34 am

    Honestly, Square-Enix’s desire to crush fanboyism is completely absurd. If all fanboyism was crushed by making all of these games multi-platform, then the market would be tipped in the favor of the cheaper system. There would be no exclusive’s to compel people to buy a certain system. The idea will never truly surface in the way that they say. I think that the idea to create FFXIII for the Xbox 360 had no intention aside from creating more unnecessary revenue for the company. Sure most Final Fantasy fans will probably still buy the game for either system, but Square-Enix is becoming greedy and leaving the system that has been loyal to them. The fact that they didn’t even tell Sony prior to the press conference reveals their “betrayal” oriented actions. This is most certainly true despite their intentions to make their games multi-platform. They mislead the company that has been their “go to” man, and the situation is going to cause conflict amongst companies. IMO, I am disgusted at this business decision, but that is me as I have been loyal to Sony and the FF series for 11 years. This was devastating, and if my brother wouldn’t buy the game, I would stick with Versus and forget XIII. Honor means a lot to me. Primarily my loyalty to the Final Fantasy series, and everything Sony did to support them.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  32. #32 Limmic
    July 17, 2008 pm31 8:07 am

    Fanboyism is stupid, plain and simple. Loving your PS3 or Xbox360 is fine, everyone has a preference for one reason or another, whether is be performence, online, game library, etc.

    What is with all the whining? People are acting like they had a pact with Square-Enix and are being personally betrayed. Logic says that they will make more money by having it on both systems. Anyone who bought a PS3 a year ago for the sole purpose of getting FFXIII or some other exclusive is an idiot and has no reason to complain. Why would you buy a console 1 or 2 years before a game “could” be released, especially when games are notorious for being delayed for a long time on the new systems?

    As for the people who are saying “FF has been a Sony exlusive for 10 years!”. You seriously need to just shut up. I have been playing FF since FF4 was out on the SNES. I have played every single one since, I own nearly all of them.

    Any TRUE fan of FF should be excited by this news, more money = more games. Not to mention the potential for a greater audience for the game, which anyone who loves FF should want. I want more people to know why its a good game. But first time gamers aren’t going to go out and buy a PS3 just to try a game, thats nonsense. Square-Enix is playing it smart, widen their audience, generate greater revenue and they can keep going with new games. They aren’t in their prime anymore, they have to make up for it somehow.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  33. #33 leon
    July 17, 2008 pm31 9:03 am

    hahahaha … this article make me laught .. first it is soo clear that the writer is 360 fan …

    well .. here is my opinion of some what he wrote ..

    ** - Im not buying Final Fantasy XIII anymore because Xbox 360 gamers don’t deserve it. (Should we discriminate people now?)**

    well ther were discrimination before this happen ..ps3 vs xbox360.. xbox360 batter then ps3 .. and alote …

    ** - Final Fantasy is a Playstation game. (Was originally a Nintendo game) **

    we;; which consol gave FF a name ? ps right? you said by youre self that if SE didn’t change to PS then there will not be a FF like now .. that why most of PS3 fans and owner and FF fans think FF stay on PS only ..

    well i don’t care that much if FF will go to xbox360 or not .. but come on …that was backhit on sony .. and it is really hurt

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  34. #34 paul smith
    July 17, 2008 pm31 10:32 am

    i dont care at all that its coming to the x360. i am just really annoyed that i will have to wait even longer for the game while it gets ported to the other console design.
    if anyone thinks it will take the same amount of time to do a translation, as it will to do a port, then they are kidding themselves.
    the fact that square have accepted money to delay the ps3 release is what really p***** me off.
    on a completely unrelated topic, i may just look into the cost of 3-5 verbatim dvd 9’s in the meantime and possibly blow the dust of my 360.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  35. #35 leon
    July 17, 2008 pm31 10:55 am

    forget to say something … if SE want FF fans and PS fans to forget this all thinf .. ther is one way ..

    REMAKE OF FINAL FANTASY VII hahahaha .. that what i belive ;).. on PS3 offcours

    well my hope are high .. i hope they make it ;)

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  36. #36 Dreamer
    July 17, 2008 pm31 2:12 pm

    The article’s message is severely flawed but it makes a good point.

    Now everybody can play it! The only problem is that it is common knowledge that the PS3 has some of the most beautiful and detailed games out there. With Bluray and the Cell processor, one’s mind cannot help but wonder: Will the 360 hold the PS3 “back”?

    I know what all of the 360 fanbois are thinking. “but zomg, Gears of War 2 looks teh best!!11″ True, but not as good as Uncharted or MGS4, in the opinion of many game critics out there. And, mind you, GeoW2 is made by a company who developed the Unreal engine themselves.

    Oh well, here’s to hoping.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  37. #37 getheledout
    July 17, 2008 pm31 2:45 pm

    They’re won’t be any problems with this game on the 360. It’s not that the system can’t handle it…It’s the job of the people programming the game, to get it on the disk. Square is known for doing just that. I love it when people are like, It can only be done on one system or another. It just shows how blind and stupid they really are. This year is going to be great for gaming.I own a 360, and I thought along with so many others, that last year was great, but theres still 6 months left this year and I already have 6 or 7 titles on hold or paid for. I don’t care what any fan boy says… I say,” Thank You MICROSOFT and partners for a great couple of years and more to come!!!”

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  38. #38 getheledout
    July 17, 2008 pm31 3:58 pm

    I have to admit it would be nice to truly talk to other gamers about games if they were the same on all systems, instead of b.s.ing over whos system is better. A GOOD GAME is a GOOD GAME no matter the system its on.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  39. #39 cloud 279
    July 18, 2008 pm31 6:29 pm

    Yes, its true that Square will make more money.
    Yes, its also true that SE will be able to produce more games. I feel bad for FF13 to loose its exclusivity from Sony & going multi-platform. I don’t know if MS paid SE to make the game multi-platform. I know people have made good points above, by being able to reach more consumers which is a company’s ultimate goal, but I ask to achieve new consumer do you kick your loyal consumer to the street? (from a general company point of view not necessarily SE) I know many will say SE isn’t kicking Sony out, but is also giving them a game. Forget loyalty, forget money, but will I be able to trust SE anymore that is the question. For 2 years they said this game is PS3 exclusivity, but just 3 days prior to e3 they decide to make the game multi-platform. I’m all for SE making money, and releasing more titles, but how can I take SE word in the future, and they will maintain that word? This is my rant

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  40. #40 cloud 279
    July 18, 2008 pm31 6:33 pm

    Just so you know I’ll be buying this game for the PS3 no questions asked, but this distrust will remain.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  41. #41 chi
    July 22, 2008 pm31 7:42 pm

    My protest to Square Enix - Just stop playing and buying + supporting Square Enix games… And see what they will do.
    Protest is a protest, you don’t do it, they won’t realise that they have betrayed their fans.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  42. #42 Josh
    August 3, 2008 pm31 7:03 pm

    Why do PlayStation 3 owners always go on about all this “loyalty” bullshit? Big deal, they bought a PlayStation 2 because it was the best selling console - who didn’t own a PlayStation 2? A minority, that’s for sure.

    I’d understand if they bought the PlayStation, PS2 and PS3 just for Final Fantasy titles; but some how I doubt they did. And what makes Xbox 360 owners any less loyal? They could’ve played every single Final Fantasy title, then picked up a 360 for Final Fantasy XI.

    In the end, it just shows how arrogant and naive PlayStation 3 fanboys really are. They think that they deserve Final Fantasy XIII merely because they have the so called “cell processor of the universe” - why would Sony fanboys deserve a game just because Sony filled their console with more expensive technology?

    Does flashing more cash make a console better? Let’s just look at the Nintendo Wii - I guess it doesn’t mean shit unless you’ve got the games to back it up, and guess what; the PlayStation 3 doesn’t.

    And to those saying that PlayStation was the console that gave Final Fantasy a name, that’s total crap. I don’t think Square Enix would make five sequels to the original title if it wasn’t popular.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  43. #43 Benard
    August 8, 2008 pm31 3:42 pm

    Ok I really disagree with this article. I for one is a PS3 owner and I love Final Fantasy. I don’t even mind that Xbox 360 is getting their share. Its the fact that PS3 may be effected hard as in time release and development on the game thanks to this Xbox 360 announcement. First off last year (2007) they stated that It will be for Ps3 only and cannot be formatted on any other systems because of space. Now all of a sudden they are going to release it on Xbox 360 too which may take awhile to do because of different formats and space. Damn they havent even started on any development yet on the 360. Its funny how it works but Money talks in this world. Microsoft thinks they are smart. But Anyway i’m looking forward for it whenever it comes out. Honestly Xbox 360 owners hope you enjoy it too as well.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  44. #44 ANT MELE
    August 8, 2008 pm31 9:41 pm

    its not like ps3 people aren’t going to be able to play it..

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  45. #45 Ixcer
    August 11, 2008 pm31 12:09 am

    Honestly, let them put it on whatever system they want. Just as long as it comes out for the ps3, i don’t care, not in the slightest. That’s only because i know that it being on the ps3, it automatically makes it the best way to buy final fantasy XIII. Why? Because the ps3 has the best of everything, so why would it be wrong to say that they would also have the best of Final Fantasy XIII? It wouldn’t.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  46. #46 Hakuro de Killer
    August 11, 2008 pm31 7:36 pm

    I feel that, after reading this article, I have to post something regardless whether my point has been put into the comments or not. I am a fanboy of Square-Enix which, if you remember, ladies and gentlemen, is a third party developer. If you want to blame anyone for their move, blame Sony for making an ungodly expensive gaming system that could easily hinder Square-Enix’s sales if they were to remain exclusive. Just a note that, in the article, it was said the move from the SNES to the PSX caused controversy with VII, and it turned out to be a smash hit! Who is to really say that Square-Enix should commit financial suicide for the good of their fans? Do you really want Square-Enix’s potential downfall on your conscience?

    Think about it. If their games were multi-platform, they make enough money to make more games, If they remain exclusive to a console that a lot of people cannot afford, Square-Enix will eventually die. Even fanboys usually only buy one legitimate copy of a game. If you want Square-Enix to reamin on the PS3, every Sony puritan can buy about 20 copies of each game to sustain the money they would make multi-platform.

    Also, I don’t doubt that the PS3 is fantastic. I’ve never played one, but I bet the system is really good. However, there is one major flaw in your logic that it’s better than everything else. IT’S $600 F**king dollars! The XBox 360 came out at $400 and it had a million and a half bugs on release, true, but the Wii came out at $250 and so far, it’s cheap, easy to pick up and play for anyone with common sense, and there are a few decent titles. now I’m sorry to the PS3 owners who bought a PS3 because they look to their childhood roots of playing their old SNES or N64 and look to today saying Mario’s for children. Guess what, that childhood ‘phase’ that you got rid of is now kicking your asses in sales. Square-Enix acknowledges this as they are trying to get back into Nintendo’s good graces with Crystal Chronicles and the DS titles being released. One would have to be an idiot not to see the fact that Square-Enix and Nintendo are mending their burned bridges.

    In the end, if you REALLY care about Square-Enix, just let it go. If you keep this up, YOU will be responsible for Square-Enix’s destruction.

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  47. #47 Jay D
    August 13, 2008 pm31 1:46 am

    Look, I think that I (and I am sure there are others out there in the same position) can be a good voice on the issue…I was (and probably still am) a Sony Whore if you will. I STILL have my PS2 and a TON of games for it. When the 360 first came out I was REALLY against it cause I felt they rushed it…there was still PLENTY of potential in the regular XBox…plus there was NOTHING on the 360 that I wanted to play. Then add to it the fact that the few XBox games I had weren’t even PLAYABLE on the damn thing right away (the ONE thing that would have made me at least THINK about getting a 360 was their statements that it was ‘backward compatible’ and THAT wasn’t fully TRUE now was it >:( damn you MS). So I decided to stick to my PS2 and not even worry about a next-gen system.

    Then comes news of the PS3! HELL YEAH!…that is til I see that INSANE price tag >_< There is no way in HELL I can afford a PS3…nor am I WILLING to even pay that much for a gaming system (yes I KNOW it’s not ’supposed’ to be a “gaming system” but an entertainment system, but whatever) so once again I decide to forgo a next-gen console for the time being.

    Now, the 360 has gone WAY down in price, and so far they actually have games that I want to play. Where the XBox really had NO RPGs (of which I am a HUGE fan) they now seem to be getting all or at least most of them, while the PS3 is still chugging along with only a few games that I would like to play.

    So, I can actually AFFORD a 360, I was NOT about to buy a PS3 for only ONE game (that is INSANE…whoever that was that said SE had no faith in their fans in that they didn’t think we would buy a PS3 simply for FFXIII you are crazy…that is a LOT of money for one game…sorry if that sounds offensive, but it’s true)

    Now, I think that Sony is to blame for this for one reason…why in the HELL didn’t they make Blu-Ray optional?! Just as MS did with their system (offering a much more affordable system that’s basically stripped down, but that can be upgraded when and where needed)…that would have been the SMART choice. They wouldn’t have lost so much money, their marketing would have went MUCH smoother and SE wouldn’t have gotten antsy about the PS3’s future (in case some of you don’t already know this, a little while back, it was announced that the president or CEO of SE was pretty upset and worried about how Sony was handling the PS3 in general and that he was worried about it’s future in the market…I think he too understood that Sony, in it’s strive to outdo MS and even Nintendo made a few mistakes in the planning and designing of the system…at that time IIRC there was already word of SE focusing more on other platforms at the very least highly considering multi-plat support for most of it’s future games).

    The smart move would have been for there to be a Blu-Ray add-on or maybe an Premium package if you will where it’s blu-ray support or what not. Hell even the blu-ray players had to come down in price only MONTHS after it’s debut because of poor sales do to high cost. I’m pretty sure they too have lost TONS of money now…it’s just that in todays US economy, it’s not likely that you will survive long if you try to put luxury over cost…it just don’t add up that way.

    Now, I am a SE fan through and through…FF6 is probably my FAVORITE in the series and I too am DYING to see if the rumors of a FFVII remake are true, but I’m sorry…if I have to buy a PS3 to play the FF games at it’s current price range, I’ll be waiting awhile while everyone else is playing it til the system comes down in price just a little more…cause money don’t grow on trees, I’ve got bills to pay, and I can’t play ANY video game system without a home and/or electricity…

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  48. #48 Dean
    August 13, 2008 pm31 12:10 pm

    Jay D - You make a valuable point.

    I may of been persuaded to buy a PS3 if the price was so much lower. The Blu-ray add on would of been a great idea. Darn Sony! I prob wont ever buy a PS3 - it would cost about £500 for the console and 3 games.

    What i dont get is that even though the currency is worth less in the US, we europeans (PAL) still have to pay more for the console. Whats up with that?

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  49. #49 Wize Monkey
    September 7, 2008 pm31 6:41 am

    What you do onto others will be done onto you!

    this is history repeatin it self’ sony from ninty, now x360 from sony!

    Post ReplyPost Reply
  • Trackback: This is Your Console PlayGround » Square Enix to Crush Fanboyism Trackback
  • Leave a Comment